Human Tonik Supergreen Tonik review

Sold as 30 single serve sachets per bag. The brand states plainly that the formula contains no proprietary blends.

The label serving is Single serve sachets, 30 per bag.

Readers who want pre measured servings and a fully disclosed formula.

Full per ingredient amounts. The ingredients page states that the formula uses no proprietary blends and publishes full transparency labeling.

We keep organic certification, supplier documentation and finished product testing as separate fields. Where a manufacturer states something we cannot confirm from a primary source, we record it as a claim rather than a verified fact.

Certified organic: Not publicly verified. We have not confirmed a current certification statement for this product from a primary source.

• Supplier certificates of analysis: Not publicly verified. No published document from an identifiable source.
• Incoming ingredient testing: Not publicly verified. No published document from an identifiable source.
• Finished product third party testing: Not publicly verified. We have not found published finished product third party testing from an identifiable source. We do not commission laboratory testing.

These three layers are reported separately on purpose. A supplier document or an incoming ingredient check is not the same thing as an independent test of the finished product.

At the listed price of $87.00 for 30 servings, this works out to $2.90 per serving on the listed price, 30 sachet bag basis. Promotions and subscription pricing change often.

One of the higher prices per serving in the greens group.

• GreensYes
• Meal replacementNot the focus
• High plant proteinNot the focus
• Daily nutritionYes
• Gut and digestionNot the focus
• Functional herbsNot the focus

• Ingredient quality18%5.9 / 10

  Weighted across the ingredient attributes: every ingredient named with its own amount (10). Organic certification carries the most weight, then whole food sourcing, then named amounts and freedom from artificial additives. Attributes we could not publicly verify are held at the neutral baseline of 5.0 out of 10 rather than left out, so an unverified attribute earns no credit.

• Nutrient density15%Not publicly verified

  Not scored. We have not verified a nutrition facts panel and a serving weight for this product, so nutritional substance cannot be measured.

• Label transparency14%10.0 / 10

  Label disclosure recorded as full per ingredient amounts, which scores 10 out of 10 on this criterion.

• Value per gram18%Not publicly verified

  Not scored. Value per gram needs both a verified price and a verified serving weight in grams.

• Product per dollar5%Not publicly verified

  Not scored. This needs a verified listed price, serving count and serving weight so the total container grams can be derived.

• Serving grams delivered5%Not publicly verified

  Not scored. The label serving weight in grams is not published in a source we can cite.

• Price per serving5%6.3 / 10

  $2.90 per label serving, scaled against the 11 products in the database with a verified price. A labeled serving is not a standard unit, which is why this criterion carries only 5% of the rubric.

• Testing and certifications10%Not publicly verified

  Not scored. We have not found published finished product third party testing from an identifiable source. We do not commission laboratory testing.

• Packaging protection10%Not publicly verified

  Not publicly verified. We have not verified the container material and barrier properties from a source we can cite, so this criterion is withheld from the score rather than assumed.

How this figure is calculated. Each criterion is multiplied by its rubric weight and the total is divided by the full 100 points of the rubric. A criterion we could publicly verify earns the points its evidence supports. A criterion we could not verify is held at the neutral baseline of 5.0 out of 10 and still occupies its full weight, so unverified evidence can never be excluded from the division and cannot earn the credit a verified strength earns.

For Human Tonik Supergreen Tonik the verified criteria contribute 5.9 x 18 + 10.0 x 14 + 6.3 x 5 = 277.7 points. The 6 criteria that are not publicly verified cover 63 points of rubric weight and contribute 5.0 x 63 = 315.0 points at the baseline. The total divided by 100 gives 5.9 out of 10.

37% of the rubric weight here is backed by publicly verified evidence. Not publicly verified means Greens Powder Guide could not independently verify this criterion from publicly available evidence. It does not necessarily mean the brand does not meet the criterion, which is why the baseline sits at the middle of the scale rather than at zero.

Read this score with care. Less than half of the rubric weight is publicly verified here, so most of this number rests on the neutral baseline rather than on evidence. It is not directly comparable with a product scored on most of the rubric, and for that reason this product is listed below the fully evidenced products in our rankings rather than beside them.

• AG1 Next Gen review
• Bloom Nutrition Greens and Superfoods review
• Amazing Grass Green Superfood, The Original review